81535 Co-evolution of Problem and Solution

Warning: The information on this page is indicative. The subject outline for a particular session, location and mode of offering is the authoritative source of all information about the subject for that offering. Required texts, recommended texts and references in particular are likely to change. Students will be provided with a subject outline once they enrol in the subject.

Subject handbook information prior to 2019 is available in the Archives.

UTS: Design, Architecture and Building
Credit points: 6 cp
Result type: Grade and marks

Requisite(s): 81533c Foundation Public Sector Innovation Practices AND 81534c Problem Framing
The lower case 'c' after the subject code indicates that the subject is a corequisite. See definitions for details.
There are course requisites for this subject. See access conditions.

Description

In this subject students learn how solutions and problems co-evolve in design-based, creative problem-solving. Students develop proficiency in utilising iteration methods that support effective co-evolution. To achieve these learning outcomes students continue to apply the frame creation methodology to their nominated industry project initiated in 81534 Problem Framing. Multiple stakeholders are included to develop cross-organisational frames and solutions. Students are guided in this process through weekly studios, guest lectures and peer feedback.

Subject learning objectives (SLOs)

1.	Understand and articulate the fundamentals and benefits of an iterative problem solving approach
2.	Progress concepts through to implementable solutions through use of iteration methods such as experimentation
3.	Engage and collaborate with stakeholders to coevolve a shared view of problem and solutions
4.	Understand how to use the design process to enhance discourse with stakeholders around the problem and solution space

Course intended learning outcomes (CILOs)

This subject also contributes to the following Course Intended Learning Outcomes:

• apply leadership skills to take a proactive role in identifying and collaboratively addressing problem situations in a public sector context, and to promote the values of innovation to others working in the public sector (A.3)
• facilitate cross-organisational communication and collaboration in a public sector innovation context (C.2)
• articulate ideas simply, succinctly and persuasively to a diverse group of stakeholders or audience (C.3)
• develop interventions - such as products, services, procedures, and policies - through a co-evolution of problem and solution (I.2)

Contribution to the development of graduate attributes

Teaching and learning strategies

This subject is delivered via weekly online modules. Learning activities include: individual independent research and learning, videos on design methods and tool, online exercises, online group discussions and reading material.

Content (topics)

• Design iteration - prototyping
• Co-design - probes, scenario maps + personas
• Storytelling + pitching
• Engagement techniques
• Exploring futures
• Paths to implementation

Assessment

Assessment task 1: Co-design exercise reflection

Intent:	The purpose of this assignment is to enable students to reflect on the issues explored during the last semester in readiness for co-evolving the problem and solution.
Objective(s):	This task addresses the following subject learning objectives: 1 and 3 This task also addresses the following course intended learning outcomes that are linked with a code to indicate one of the five CAPRI graduate attribute categories (e.g. C.1, A.3, P.4, etc.): A.3 and I.2
Type:	Report
Groupwork:	Individual
Weight:	20%
Criteria linkages:	Criteria Weight (%) SLOs CILOs Understanding of the problem context 50 1 A.3 Collaborate effectively with stakeholders 50 3 I.2 SLOs: subject learning objectives CILOs: course intended learning outcomes

Assessment task 2: Using tools from Design Practice

Intent:	The intent of this assignment is to show understanding of different design tools and the ability to use them in problem solving.
Objective(s):	This task addresses the following subject learning objectives: 3 and 4 This task also addresses the following course intended learning outcomes that are linked with a code to indicate one of the five CAPRI graduate attribute categories (e.g. C.1, A.3, P.4, etc.): C.2 and C.3
Type:	Report
Groupwork:	Individual
Weight:	20%
Criteria linkages:	Criteria Weight (%) SLOs CILOs To illustrate understanding of design practice tools 50 3 C.2 Ability to reflect on the usefulness of the chosen tools 50 4 C.3 SLOs: subject learning objectives CILOs: course intended learning outcomes

Assessment task 3: 3A:Final Pitch 3B:Co-Evolution + Solution 3C:Peer Review

Intent:	This assessment facilitates the opportunity for students to present their project outcomes to the group, tutors and key stakeholders.
Objective(s):	This task addresses the following subject learning objectives: 2, 3 and 4 This task also addresses the following course intended learning outcomes that are linked with a code to indicate one of the five CAPRI graduate attribute categories (e.g. C.1, A.3, P.4, etc.): A.3, C.3 and I.2
Type:	Presentation
Groupwork:	Group, individually assessed
Weight:	60%
Criteria linkages:	Criteria Weight (%) SLOs CILOs Ability to iterate and prototype to achieve desired solutions 40 2 A.3 Engage successfully with the stakeholders 30 3 C.3 Understanding of the design process 30 4 I.2 SLOs: subject learning objectives CILOs: course intended learning outcomes

Required texts

1. Christiansen, J. and Bunt, L., 2012. Innovation in policy: allowing for creativity. Social Complexity and Uncertainty in Public Governance (http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/assets/features/innovation_in_policy).
2. Dorst, K., Kaldor, L., Klippan, L. and Watson, R., Designing for the Common Good, BIS Publishers, Netherlands
3. Eppel, E., Turner, D. and Wolf, A., 2011. Experimentation and learning in policy implementation: Implications for public management.
4. Spencer, N., 2009. The relevance of rigour for design practise.