University of Technology SydneyHandbook 2008

55000 Communication and Information Honours Seminar

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Credit points: 8 cp
Result Type: Grade and marks

Handbook description

This subject examines a selection of contested ideas in the Australian intellectual, public policy and professional fields by reference to the theoretical resources offered by media, communication and information studies. Students explore how specific communication and information frameworks, practices, technologies and impacts are interwoven with social organisation and processes of social change. The development of comparative analyses of ideas draws on different intellectual traditions and explores their usage in different contexts. The subject also facilitates students' capacity to understand their own theoretical constructs, to locate their own usage of ideas in relation to contemporary debates in intellectual, policy and professional fields and to pursue research that contributes to those debates.

Subject objectives/outcomes

At the completion of this subject students are expected to have:

  1. gained a deeper understanding of the nature of converging terrain of media, communication and information studies, and their societal, technological and policy impacts;
  2. developed their understandings of contested areas in media, communication and information studies through a range of theoretical perspectives;
  3. understood the research traditions of these fields, their underpinning assumptions and methodological approaches, and contextual applications;
  4. developed their capacity to apply these understandings to original theoretical and/or methodological investigation as preparation for thesis development, and understand the practice and societal implications;
  5. compared and contrasted theoretical, methodological and professional perspectives, and articulated their own theoretical constructs in these disciplinary fields.
  6. demonstrated the ability to discuss future trends and issues in the disciplinary fields of media, communication and information.


Contribution to graduate profile

  • to prepare students for postgraduate research
  • to emphasise interdisciplinary approaches
  • to integrate scholarship with contemporary media
  • to undertake a program of advanced coursework

Teaching and learning strategies

Your work as a student should be directed to achieving these objectives through participation in the course activities (lectures, workshops, seminars, reading, discussions, independent work, group study, etc.) and demonstrating your achievements through the way you produce your work for assessment. You will engage with complex ideas, and extend your ability to critique ideas and to formulate your own viewpoints, positions and constructs. There is also an emphasis on independent work in the subject. Lectures will introduce theoretical perspectives, issues and methodologies of the fields, and you will be required to actively engage with the multidisciplinary literature, both in preparation for and reflection on each session, and as part of the assessment process. You will develop more sophisticated approaches to interrogating contested and conflicting domains, and begin to relate this development to the requirements of the Honours thesis.

The schedule of workshops and seminars will be fixed early in the semester, and is constructed to support the development of your methodological and empirical understandings of this subject. Our discussions may cover topics such as: the specificity of journalism in relation to other information/media practices, the power of journalism/media, notions of truth, facticity and knowledge in journalism/media, notions of community/shared experience in digital media environments, notions of expertise/professionalism in changing digital media environments, journalism/media and processes of social change.

Content

  • Historical chronology of the disciplinary areas of media, communication and information studies; their underpinning values, assumptions, traditions, epistemologies, theoretical and professional contexts, arenas of convergence and contest; issues, value of such study for students and in terms of social good and social change. (Objectives a, b)
  • Approaches to theorising, traditional and contemporary intellectual frameworks, research methodologies, ethical issues, and relationships between theory and practice. This content area will be explored for example through a focus on the concepts of 'audience' and 'information user' or other constructs as appropriate, and will further develop arenas of convergence and contest. (Objectives c, d, e)
  • Professionals, producers and practitioners: the relationship between theory, research and practice is explored to identify and analyse a range of contemporary issues that challenge the media, communication and information fields. For example, issues in relation to policy, ownership, property, publics, technology and society and professional agency. (Objectives d, e)
  • Media, communication and information futures: exploration of the disciplinary fields in terms of technological developments, emerging research directions, questions of social good, and social change. (Objectives a, b, e, f)
GROUP WORK

Group work is an important aspect of both professional practice and tertiary education. In this course, group work plays a central role in enabling students to cover the breadth of reading and research required to have an understanding of the area of study. Group work may involve reading and discussion, case studies, tutorial presentations.

Group work requires an ongoing commitment by each student to other members of their group. It is important, therefore, that students actively contract between themselves to participate in and complete group tasks. Depending on the number of students in the class, you may be assigned to a group for the online debate in Assessment Item 2.

It will be up to each group to ensure that the conduct of group work is well organised and maintained. If group dynamics need attention, the tutor can be called on to assist and provide support. It is important that each student recognises that the completion of their tasks is important to both their own success as well as the members of the rest of the group.

Assessment

Assessment item 1:Independent Learning Project – essay 5000 words

Objectivesc, d, e
Value60%
Due10 June 2008
TaskYou will have the opportunity to develop and negotiate an essay topic tailored to their specific interests and needs, and negotiated with the seminar leader. You will be able to enhance your skills at scoping, undertaking and reporting on a theoretical issue or problem for investigation, and is part of the broader developmental process of students being able to define the nature and boundaries of their Honours thesis. This essay will be a substantial work of scholarship.
Assessment criteria
  • Understanding of the theories, concepts and principles relevant to concept or issue you are investigating
  • Demonstrated wide and thoughtful reading
  • Ability to analyse and critically evaluate the ideas and statements of others
  • Ability to present a sustained argument
  • Ability to use the norms and standards of scholarly communication, for example through standard referencing and bibliographic citation procedures.
You will be asked to present your essay topic in class in week 4. You will give a 'work in progress report' in class in week 10; at a minimum, this will include an annotated bibliography of the literature you will using, although ideally it will also include an outline or draft. You will be expected to submit a draft in week 12.

Assessment item 2:Participation in online debate

Objectivesa, b, f
Value40%
DueCommencing in class, Week 6
TaskThe topic of our debate is:

'Journalists have power without responsibility.'

In this assessment students will be assigned a position either for the affirmative or for the negative. Individual debate contributions will be 2000 words in length and will be logged on a weekly basis, commencing Friday 4 April. On the Monday before the online contribution, students should make available the readings they want their colleagues to familiarise themselves with before the discussion of the debate contribution.

Your tutor will give oral feedback on your online contribution during the class discussion. You will have until the following Friday to log a revised contribution. You will get a final written comment and grade at the end of the debate cycle.

In debating this topic, you should interact with multiple perspectives, and develop understandings of the complex debates surrounding the theoretical, methodological and analytical work in the fields. This will be shown through critique, argument, interpretation and presentation.

You will be assessed in terms of:

  • clear interpretations based on sound analysis, evaluation and reflection
  • ability to present content clearly and logically
  • evidence of wide and/or indepth reading
AssessmentAssessments are designed to demonstrate students own understanding of the key ideas and their interrelationships. They are a record of their interaction with the ideas of key writers in the field, with peers and their own understandings. Effective preparation and presentation of assignments will demonstrate personal integrity and respect for scholarship. This is shown in a variety of ways, such as: acknowledging sources of ideas from a range of resources (including the Internet) by using appropriate styles of acknowledgment; using quotation marks when quoting directly from a work; avoiding excessive paraphrasing, even when a source is acknowledged. Consult the UTS statement for students on Good Academic Practice.

Effective assessment also demands a high level of personal discipline, self-motivation and organisation of time. If you are not clear about any requirement, or need any assistance or additional information, please contact the subject co-ordinator.

Minimum requirements

Students are expected to read the subject outline to ensure they are familiar with the subject requirements. Since class discussion and participation in activities form an integral part of this subject, you are expected to attend, arrive punctually and actively participate in classes. If you experience difficulties meeting this requirement, please contact your lecturer. Students who have a reason for extended absence (e.g., illness) may be required to complete additional work to ensure they achieve the subject objectives.

Indicative references

The following book may be useful in helping you to situate some of the ideas and debates:

Webster, F. (2002) Theories of the Information Society, Routledge, London.

Week 2: Creating common ground

Bourdieu, P. (2005) 'The political field, the social science field and the journalistic field' in R. Benson and E. Neveu, Bourdieu and the journalistic field, Polity Press, Cambridge.

Thompson, J.B. (1995) 'The media and the development of modern society' in Media and Modernity: a social theory of the media, Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 63 – 80.

Week 3: Searching for truth

Dervin, B. (1992) 'From the mind's eye of the user: the sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology' in J.D. Glazier & R.R. Powell (Ed.) Qualitative Research in Information Management, Englewood, Co.: Libraries Unlimited. pp.61 - 84.

Keane, J. (1999, January 1). Public Life in the Era of Communicative Abundance. Canadian Journal of Communication [Online], 24(2). Available: http://www.cjc-online.ca/viewarticle.php?id=517. Accessed on 4 February 2008

Week 4: Facts, testimony and the fake

Eco, U. (1987) Travels in Hyper reality, Pan Books, London.

Frank, R. (1999) 'You Had to Be There" (And They Weren't): The Problem With Reporter Reconstructions' Journal of Mass Media Ethics, Vol. 14, No. 3, Pages 146-158

Popper, K. (1979) Objective Knowledge, Oxford, Clarendon Press or see http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/at/popper.htm. Accessed on 4 February 2008.

Week 5: Creating community

Calhoun, C. (1992) 'Introduction' in Habermas and the Public Sphere, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Buckland, M. (1991) 'Information as thing' Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp. 351 – 360. Available at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/10049442/PDFSTART, Accessed on 4 February 2008.

Castells, M. (2004) 'Why networks matter' Network Logic: Who governs in an Interconnected World, H. McCarthy, P. Miller, P. Skidmore (eds.) Demos, London, pp. 221 – 224, available at http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/networks Accessed on 4 February 2008.

Castells, M. (2004) 'Informationalism, Networks, and the Network Society: A Theoretical Blueprint' in M. Castells (ed.) The Network Society; a cross cultural perspective, Northampton, Edward Elgar. http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/networks Accessed on 4 February 2008.

Week 6: Expertise and everyday experiences

Boyce, T. (2006) 'Journalism and expertise' Journalism Studies, vol.7, no. 6, pp. 889 – 906, Accessed 4 February 2008.

Giddens, A. (1990) 'Abstract systems and the transformation of intimacy' in The Consequences of Modernity, Polity, Cambridge, pp. 112 – 149.

Lowrey, W. (2006) 'Mapping the journalism-blogging relationship' Journalism Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 477-500

Neumann, J. (2006) 'The impact of the internet on journalism: an examination of blogging, citizen journalism and a dot.com solution for the online edition' Available at http://journalism.utexas.edu/onlinejournalism/2006/papers/Julie.pdf . Accessed on 4 February 2008

Week 7: Social change and the cosmopolitan

Carroll, W. K. (2006) 'Democratic media activism through the lens of social movement theory'

Media, Culture & Society, Vol. 28, No. 1, 83-104

Curran, J. (1991). Mass media and democracy: A reappraisal. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 82117). London, Edward Arnold, pp 82 – 117.

Urry, J. (2000) 'The Global Media and Cosmopolitanism', published by the Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YN, UK, at http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Urry-Global-Media.pdf Accessed on 4 February 2008.

Weeks 9 – 13:

Readings will be suggested by students, based on their interests and research

Week 14:

Deuze, Mark (2005) 'What is journalism?: Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered' Journalism, vol.6, no. 4 pp. 442-464

Morrison, David E., and Svennevig, Michael (2007) 'The defence of public interest and the intrusion of privacy: Journalists and the public' Journalism, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 44-65