This subject introduces students to the principles of creative information design—audience analysis, contextual writing, colour, typography, and layout. Students design, create the content and produce, for selected clients, useful information products in a range of digital and non-digital formats and media. The design process introduces students in creative problem-solving, collaborative work practices and the principles of usability and self-assessment. Students begin the development of their course-wide portfolio which contains examples of work which may include specialised written texts, brochures, images and webpages.
At the end of this subject students will
This subject contributes to the following graduate attributes:
Teaching strategies will strive to promote interactive learning and to foster exploration extending beyond the classroom. The weekly program will involve lectures, group discussions, collaborative workshops and computer laboratory sessions to develop the technical skills necessary for completion of assignments. Students will be using industry-standard technologies that enable them to create diverse types of information products which contain text and image formats. Active participation at all stages will be essential for successful completion of this course. Students will be expected to prepare for class discussions, using readings and computer exercises as required. Participation on the subject's UTS Online community for discussions and collaborations will also be a significant component of the program.
To pass in this subject, students must submit all components of assessment and reach a satisfactory level overall.
Objectives | a, b, c, e, g |
Due date | Week 6 |
Value | 30% |
Task | To complete several short writing assignments for specific audiences and/or purposes (all of which are to be saved in your portfolio). Students are to select ONE of their writing assignments to place in the writing wiki along with a brief (400-500 words) evaluative document outlining the reasons for its choice. Working in small groups, each of the group's items is to be edited according to a set of criteria, thus producing a final piece of writing, along with a brief document (400-500 words) reflecting on the editing process and the effectiveness of collaborative editing. |
Assessment criteria |
|
Objectives | a, b, c, d, e |
Due date | Week 11 |
Value | 40% |
Task | To plan, design and create an appropriate information product for a specific client. Using industry-standard desktop publishing software, the student will create both the textual and image content for this product, which must meet a basic professional standard. The information product must be accompanied by a brief (400-500 words) document evaluating the usability of a similar print product; a planning document that gives a client needs analysis, and production timeframe; and a report (1000 words) rationale for all decisions concerning the format of the product, its design and usability to meet the client's information needs. |
Assessment criteria |
|
Objectives | a, b, c, d, f, g |
Due date | Week 14 |
Value | 30% |
Task | To create an interface to an e-portfolio using basic web design tools and techniques, and to populate the portfolio with work created in this subject. The interface will reflect relevant categories and sections for the material, with contextual links to the content, which must include all work for this subject. Included in the e-portfolio must be a well-designed report (1000 words) that sets out the student's course-wide goals and objectives and evaluates his//her learning processes and achievements in this subject. |
Assessment criteria |
|
Students are expected to read the subject outline to ensure they are familiar with the subject requirements. Since class discussion and participation in activities form an integral part of this subject, you are expected to attend, arrive punctually and actively participate in classes. If you experience difficulties meeting this requirement, please contact your lecturer. Students who have a reason for extended absence (e.g., illness) may be required to complete additional work to ensure they achieve the subject objectives.
References:
Barrett, H.C. 2007, 'Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: the REFLECT initiative', Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, vol. 50, no.6, pp: 436-449.
Beyer, H. & Holtzblatt, K. 1998, Contextual design : defining customer-centered systems, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, Calif.
Brown, D.M. 2007, Communicating design: developing Web site documentation for design and planning, Peachpit Press, Berkeley, Calif.
Candy, P.C. 2000, 'Reaffirming a proud tradition: universities and lifelong learning', Active learning in higher education, vol.1, no.2, pp: 101-125.
Coe, M. 1996, Human factors for technical communicators, Wiley, New York.
Cooper, A. & Reimann, R. 2003, About face 2.0 : the essentials of interaction design, Wiley, Indianapolis.
Dillon, A. 2003, Designing usable electronic text, 2nd edn, Taylor & Francis, New York.
Dumas, J.S. & Redish, J.C. 1999, A Practical Guide To Usability Testing, Intellect, Exeter.
Garrett, J.J. 2003, The elements of user experience : user-centered design for the web, American Institute of Graphic Arts, New York.
Hackos, J.T. & Redish, J.C. 1998, User and task analysis for interface design, Wiley, New York.
Hix, D. & Hartson, H.R. 1993, Developing user interfaces : ensuring usability through product & process, Wiley, New York.
Horn, R.E. 1998, Visual language : global communication for the 21st century, MacroVU, Bainbridge Island, Wash.
Kuniavsky, M. 2003, Observing the user experience : a practitioner's guide to user research, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, Calif.
Jacobson, R. (ed.) 1999, Information design, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Nielsen, J. 2000, Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity, New Riders, Indianapolis (Ind).
Norman, D.A. 1988, 1990, The design of everyday things, Doubleday, New York.
Schriver, K.A. 1997, Dynamics in document design, Wiley Computer Pub., New York.
Tufte, E.R.1990, Envisioning information, Graphics Press, Cheshire, Conn.
---------1997, Visual explanations : images and quantities, evidence and narrative, Graphics Press, Cheshire, Conn.
Walker, S. 2001, Typography and language in everyday life : prescriptions and practices, Longman, New York.
Watson, D. 2003, Death sentence : the decay of public language, Random House Australia, Milsons Point, N.S.W.
Wyrick, J. 2008, Steps to writing well : with additional readings, Thomson/Wadsworth, Boston
Zwaga, H.J.G., Boersema, T. & Hoonhout, H.C.M. (eds) 1999, Visual information for everyday use : design and research perspectives, Taylor & Francis, London.
JOURNALS
Information Design Journal
Interactions
Technical Communications